What is Contextualism Anyway?

“Contextual design emphasizes compatibility and works to respect the scale, height, setback, materials and detailing of surrounding older buildings. This does not mean that new designs need to look old – in most cases, this would be inappropriate. Rather, it means that contemporary design should blend with the old so that new and old are distinguishable but compatible. The sense of continuity and basic sensitivity to the old has been referred to as an “architectural genetic code”₍₁₎, a code of craftsmanship worked out over generations of trial and error.”₍₂₎

_{A reader’s comment on a (January 12^th, 2011) blog article in the Preservation Institute Blog about contextualism was spot on. David Sucher is quoted as saying said... “Contextualism is only of value when the context is valuable.” The blog dissected an article in the New York Times by Nicolai Ouroussoff discussing the philosophy of what is actually worth preserving.}

Charles Siegel author of the Preservation Institute Blog writes: -

“When we were on the defensive because traditional urbanism was constantly being threatened by modernist projects, it made some sense to talk about design that respects its context. But now that we are beginning to transform inhuman modernist developments into good places for people to be, it is time to start talking about design that respects human nature. It is time to move from architectural contextualism to architectural humanism.”

Kurt Anderson’s writings from 1987, republished recently are well worth reading, for they bring a balanced perspective to the discussion about preservation and new construction. Times are demanding a little more common sense as well as common sensitivity. I have quoted liberally from Anderson’s work below.

 “What has come to be known as gentrification -- the migration of (mainly white) middle-class homesteaders into poor (mainly black and Hispanic) urban neighborhoods -- is neither the cause nor an effect, exactly, of the historic renovation boom. But the two trends have abetted each other. The original '60s militants of the preservation movement were the shock troops of the upper middle class, and it was a broader swath of the same class who in the '70s made living amid urban antiquity seem both virtuous and stylish. Restored carriage houses and pressed-tin ceilings have seduced more children of the suburbs back to the city than mean, shiny apartment towers.”

Preservation can set up a self-destructive cycle. When a historic neighborhood is restored, it becomes desirable and prices go up, and when prices go up sufficiently, developers think dollars per square foot, high- rise, wrecking ball. They wind up selling the view of a historic district from a condominium tower that has supplanted a piece of that history.

Not every old building can be saved. Not every old building should be saved. Except for set pieces like fussy little Colonial Williamsburg or the elegant Upper East Side of Manhattan, cities should not remain stuck in time. As Charlestonians have learned, vitality depends on at least modest infusions of new building. Even preservationists, most of them, agree in principle. Says Gene Norman, chairman of New York City's Landmarks Preservation Commission: "We are not trying to create a museum city."

Yet the reflexive impulse to preserve everything, even the relatively new and banal, occasionally shows signs of getting out of hand. "People are just beginning to talk about ' '50s classics' now, which is a term that embraces some really appalling ticky-tack," says the British-born architectural historian Reyner Banham, who lives in California. "There is a tendency to overlook the aesthetic quality of a building and just keep it because it is old," says Robert Winter, a cultural historian at Occidental College in Los Angeles. "Too often the reason for declaring something ((a historic landmark)) is sentimental." Sentiment is inadmissible? Isn't the new feeling for preservation and for cities inherently romantic, clear-headedness clouded by a large dose of nostalgia?”

According to the D.C. Historic Preservation Office: - 

“Planning and neighborhood protection. Historic designation is an important planning tool for the city, a way to improve the quality of life and a means to protect neighborhoods from unmanaged change.

Public participation. Because the review process involves public comment, citizens are given a voice in development affecting their neighborhoods.

Designing a new building that contributes to, rather than detracts from, the character of a historic district begins with an analysis of the character-defining features of the existing historic buildings, streets and landscapes. Typically, character-defining features include: setback. Orientation, scale, proportion, rhythm, massing, height, materials, color, roof shape and details and ornamentation.

A new building should be compatible with the existing environment without exactly duplicating existing buildings. A new building in a historic district must also conform to the District of Columbia’s zoning and building codes.

A new building should be seen as a product of its own time. To reproduce a historic building or to copy exactly a style from the past, creates a false sense of history. By relating to the existing buildings and the environment, but being of its own time, a new building shows a district’s evolution just as the existing buildings show its past. Perhaps the best way to think about a compatible new building is that it should be a good neighbor, enhancing the character of the district and respecting the context, rather than an exact clone.” 

(1) Kurt Anderson, “Spiffing Up the Urban Heritage,” Time, 23 November 1987, page 76

(2) Norman Tyler, “Historic Preservation” – an introduction to its history, principles and practice, W.W. Norton and Company, 2000  page 139

(3) New Construction in Historic Districts

(4) Introduction to the Historic Preservation Guidelines 

(5) D.C. Alley Survey Project 

Small Spaces for Living Large

The concept of Live/Work is explored through this video recently published in FastCompany under The Future of Living Where you Work and Working Where you Live.  (about 10 minutes)

Most of us are living inside a box of one type or another. Within that box we design other smaller boxes (and call them bedrooms) or make decisions to take down walls to create larger inside boxes (and call them "open concept"). Then most of us go to work each day inside another very large box filled with hundreds of smaller boxes inside which many of us working inside tiny boxes - cubes/cubicles.

Why not strive to live outside of functionally and formally defined boxes and create a space that is like our bodies and designed for both work and play, depending on the time of day, the circumstances or inclinations. Not everyone has this luxury, but for the increasing number who do, this recent Fast Company article taps into that vein directly.

Smaller work/live spaces have the potential to play a large role in providing infill options for cities willing to recognize their opportunities to develop these voids. The ideal buildings already exist within many alleys, as stables and warehouses. Adaptive reuse can be very cost effective and create an attractive architectural pastiche at the rear of buildings that is eventually much more interesting than their fronts.

Blagden Alley Community Responds to New Development Proposals

Representatives of Suzane Reatig Architecture, presented a new version of their plans for the lot at 926 N Street at the Blagden Alley-Naylor Court Association Meeting this week. At the last ANC 2F meeting this group received painful fusillades of public criticism from all sides, not only for the design itself but also for not engaging in a constructive participatory process with the community. They were also accused by several audience members of trying to “slide something objectionable under the community radar without discussion – or knowledge.” To the firm's credit they suggested at the ANC 2F meeting that they had no interest in creating a building that nobody liked. So the dialog begins. 

Other D.C. companies “get it” and work hard to engage the hearts and minds of any community within which they work. CASRiegler is one such company. Their Company mission as articulated on their web site is: 

“to create unique real estate products in urban-infill locations that meet the needs of today’s city dwellers, workers and retail customers. Today’s urban environment calls for sustainable practices and responsible living. CAS Riegler Companies is determined to provide homes and work spaces that match today’s urban-centric values while never sacrificing exceptional style or character.”

This is a “young company” with young/youthful people, yet they have already managed to establish for themselves within Washington, a reputation for working hard with the community on each project to get a sense of the surrounding environment and people to create something new that has a modern edge that fits within the spectrum of tasteful development. CAS Riegler presented a very preliminary proposal rendering for a project of their own on the same block as Reatig’s project at the corner of 9^th and N at the same BANCA meeting. The community applauded them this week for both their early engagement and their design. They have also recently been recognized for their work in DC  "Urban Pace Recognizes CAS Riegler Companies for Their Contribution to the Arts"

What is tasteful and edgy new construction that has managed to become happily married with the old? It’s rather hard to define – like pornography – but to paraphrase an old quote one usually knows it when one sees it. For example most would say that the carbuncular addition to the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto lacks taste. It may be “edgy” and “raw” and “different” but it’s jarring. It rocks you and not in a good way. Some say it will grow on you. Most say not. But like a scar I guess people come to accept it over time, as a sort of tolerance by resignation because it’s not going anywhere and the battle has been lost. 

For an in-depth exploration of this addition you can review the details of what is now referred to as the Michael Lee-Chin Crystal.

What are alternative suggestions for development at the 926 N site? Brendan Behan the great Irish poet once said, “Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves.” However, many in the Blagden Alley Naylor Court community are well qualified to do much more than simply criticize. Below is an example of an alternative concept created yesterday by OdCStudio, a local design practice.

The blog wires are buzzing about this project and indeed about the city’s newfound interest in alleys and infill construction. Suddenly 9^th Street and alleys have become hot topics. Shilpi Paul who writes prolifically for Urban Turf has captured this in several of her recent articles including “9th Street:DC’s Next “It” Boulevard."  

The dialog will continue and eventually – as in the case of the Whitman Building (shown above) – something will be created that makes sense and also creates a feeling of warmth and perhaps wonderment.

The 926 N site is especially important strategically because it is one of the four portals to the interior of the Blagden Alley block. How it succeeds in its ability to beckon and draw people into the alley (or repel them) is a large part of what this discussion is all about.

Is it possible for Washington D.C. architects and developers to intelligently capitalize on the many current infill opportunities in the area of the 9th Street Corridor by crafting something that has a respectful and maybe even impish nod to the past and a tip of the hat to the future?

Stay tuned!

Better still, turn up your inner and outer voices and become part of this stirring conversation. Once a building has been constructed, barring an act of nature, it’s there for a very, very long time. Future generations will wonder why this generation kept so quiet. It’s more than a war of taste. There are many well-established guiding principles and emotions in play here.

Academic Adaptive Reuse of a German former Stable

Reference from the Chronicle of Higher Education

Local Architect Disrespects the National Register Recognition of Blagden Alley.

The Convention Center Community Association recently published details of the proposal for 926 N Street that will sit on the North gateway to Blagden Alley and significantly extend into it. Seriously - is this really an appropriate portal to such a historic collection of places? 

This proposed development will abut against the massive stable in the middle of the block. Blagden Alley and its sister alley – Naylor Court – are listed in the National Register of Historic Places as an acknowledgement of their value as a collection of properties. These alleys reflect a remarkable time in the history of Washington D.C. These alleys provided buildings for stables, homes for workers, shops for small businesses and a place for a rich human engagement. The value of these two alleys is in the collective impact of the properties and the stories they tell rather than any one specific building.

 

The National Register when considering the significance of a place asks the following questions: - “Is the property associated with events, activities, or developments that were important in the past? With the lives of people who were important in the past? With significant architectural history, landscape history, or engineering achievements? Does it have the potential to yield information through archeological investigation about our past?”

Several years ago Sally Berk, who is a past president of the DC Preservation League, elegantly presented her lifetime career lessons in historic preservation within Washington D.C. Her talk which was given before the Latrobe Chapter of the Society of Architectural Historians was called “A Tour of My Losses: A Quarter Century of Preservation in Washington” which was reported in this blog on September 28^th 2008. 

These are 6 concepts that she shared.

1. Preservation is good business.

Preservation building work constitutes 50% of the building efforts in Washington D.C. and accounts for a financial contribution that is equal to that of new construction ($9.5 billion dollars for preservation and $9.5 billion dollars for new construction).

2. Preservation is about managing change and not about preventing it.

Change is inevitable. It is wiser to learn how to manage change and have an active and guiding hand in that process than to attempt to thwart it and lose the opportunity for melding preservation and change.

3. Preservation is about continuing the historic context.

The background of an area in terms of its legacy (such as music, the arts, and commercial buildings) lends a hand in contextual historic architectural preservation of that area.

4. Preservation is about respecting the historic context.

The juxtaposition of new construction that does not respect the historic context of the building or the area diminishes the historic legacy of the properties.

5. Preservation is not about copying history.

Some areas of the city that are generally thought of as “historic” have sanctioned new construction that mimics 19th Century architecture, thereby becoming a caricature of their past. Historic replication is not a substitute for historic preservation.

6. One should be able to read the layers of the city.

As one walks through any city, one should be able to read the layers of the past, as each new era’s unique style of architecture is graciously interdigitated with that of the past. Each layer should be recognizable and appreciated for its era’s contribution to the overall gestalt of the building or collection of structures.

New architecture that detracts from the “continuing the historic context” – Sally Berk’s point #3 – disrespects the value of the block. Similarly structures like the one proposed for 926 N Street NW disrespect the “continuing historic context” – point #4.

It takes intelligence, reflection, and a sense of sociology, history and substantial thoughtfulness to be a great architect – someone who can artfully blend the new with the old. Simplistically dropping a 3-D Piet Mondrian imitation box into a nationally recognized historic block is an anti-intellectual affront. Perhaps in another context this building might “fly” but this was an ill-advised site to choose. 

As Ada Louise Huxtable, the wonderfully tart tongued architecture critic for the Wall Street Journal, once said: - “An excellent job with a dubious undertaking, which is like saying it would be great if it wasn’t so awful.” 

Community responses to this and other area projects by this architect have not been kind. The following are comments that have been posted in the Renew Shaw blog and elsewhere.

Comment #1 “Awful. This non-contextual building is supposedly going to be three levels high. In these drawings one can clearly see how it towers over the neighboring historic houses, which are three stories high themselves. Counting the floors, an observer can tell that the building clearly has four to five levels, if the top units are double height. 
One can tell that the historic context of the neighborhood has not been taken into account –not even by accident- during the design process of these buildings. It looks very similar to the new “essay in primary colors” building in the 600 block of M Street NW, which could be potentially known as the second ugliest building in the neighborhood if this design is ever approved. 
Fortunately, this side of the neighborhood is considered a historic site, so this monstrosity has very little chances of being built on that spot, but one never knows!”

Comment #2. “Susan Reatig is a disgusting person who has done nothing but trash our neighborhood with the junk she puts up. Her last "trash of the neighborhood" is at 7th and M NW. In the Mt. Vernon Square Historical District she has torn down an old house that had sat on the north side of the street for over a hundred years with the dreadful trash that's almost finished. Of course with United House of Prayer (McCullough Constructon's help). Those wonderful, neighborhood conscience Christians. She trashed the end of Ridge Street at the 4th Street end on the north side of the street. She trashed N Street towards the 5th Street side in Mt. Square also. She trashed the corner of 5th and O with the junk as well. Now she's heading north to 625 Rhode Island. All of this trashing has been done with the help of United House of Prayer for All People, (7th and M NW and 7th and R NW). This is the same church that ruins the neighborhood every Memorial Day and has NEVER done one thing for the kids in the neighborhood in the 30 years I've lived here. Someone needs to stop this woman from trashing our neighborhood yet again.”

Comment #3. “I detest her designs. The one at 5th and O St. looks like a bad medical office building from the 80's.”

Comment #4 “It is simply horrendous and monstrous.”

Comment #5. “Sorry to be vulgar but this proposal is uglier than ugly, it is F_ _LY. It needs to be opposed if it hasn’t been already.”

In public recognition of the rich legacy of the alleys in Washington, the Historic Preservation Office recently launched a survey of the city’s historic alleys.

“Initial survey efforts have been focused on historic rowhouse neighborhoods, which feature the largest number of alley dwellings, carriage houses, stables, warehouses, and garages. Survey work is already underway in the alleys in Dupont Circle, Capitol Hill, Shaw, LeDroit Park, Mount Vernon Square, Mount Vernon Triangle, Greater Fourteenth Street, and U Street. HPO has collected data on over 500 alley buildings so far, with plans to continue the survey work already in progress and to expand its survey to other historic districts during 2012.” (from the HPO website) 

The proposal at 926 N Street NW is wrong minded and entirely inappropriate for this location. While the HPO is working on the one hand to protect the historic nature of the city’s alleys, on the other hand it is simultaneously working to green light this specific project to mutilate this historic alley entranceway. The architect has been sent back to the drawing board by HPO for modifications. Interestingly this is not the first project like this that has been rejected in the neighborhood because it did not respect the historic context. In many minds the 926 N monstrosity proposed should be scrapped entirely without modifications if HPO has the integrity to uphold its responsibility to wisely integrate preservation and progress. 

Seriously - what doesn't fit here: - A,B or C?

Darryl Carter’s stable is being restored and preserved

The little yellow stable in the alley behind Darryl Carter’s property is being restored in concert with the primary buildings in front of it. (the original story was reported in earlier posts in 2009 here and here) Photos show the bricks in the process of being nicely repointed. This stable is typical of late 1800’s alley stables. The hayloft beam was replaced by an “I” beam at some point in the past. Very few of the original wooden beams still exist in stables because of the wear and tear of their heavy use and their exposure to the elements since the original wood was untreated.

 

While the precise future use of this stable is uncertain at this point, the beauty of these structures is their utilitarian nature and enormous flexibility for adaptive reuse. It’s wonderful to see the spirit of the 1990 National Registry of Historic Places recognition being honored in this alley in this way.

Stable ads in Washington D.C. from 1887

HPO to document alley structures in Washington

The announcement below is wonderful news because it will bring the rich legacy of the Washington DC alley culture into fine focus. This work is a welcome undertaking! Below is the announcement from HPO about the alley survey.

*** 

January 19, 2012

Historic District Alley Survey Underway 

Historic Preservation Office embarks on extensive effort to document alley structures in the District.

The Historic Preservation Office embarks on an extensive effort to document alley structures in the District.

The Historic Preservation Office has embarked on an extensive effort to survey and document alley structures in Washington’s historic districts. Past surveys – particularly those associated with early historic district designations – did not comprehensively cover alley buildings. As a result, data on the city’s historic alley structures is not well documented or easily accessible. In fact, many alley buildings have been demolished, particularly within the past decade.

In 2011, HPO staff began gathering information on alleys through field documentation and photography of important buildings and features as well as research on historic building permits and maps. The information is being catalogued in a database, and will eventually be mapped through the Geographic Information System (GIS). This information will be valuable in better understanding the rich history of the city’s alleys, considering preservation strategies and appropriate alterations for alley buildings, and designing new alley structures that are compatible with the character of historic alleyscapes.

Initial survey efforts have been focused on historic rowhouse neighborhoods, which feature the largest number of alley dwellings, carriage houses, stables, warehouses, and garages. Survey work is already underway in the alleys in Dupont Circle, Capitol Hill, Shaw, LeDroit Park, Mount Vernon Square, Mount Vernon Triangle, Greater Fourteenth Street, and U Street. HPO has collected data on over 500 alley buildings so far, with plans to continue the survey work already in progress and to expand its survey to other historic districts during 2012.

HPO Announcement online 

They Paved Paradise

According to Baist’s Maps of Naylor Court in 1924, there were two alley stables living on the lot at 1322 9^th Street NW. It is now vacant, and languishing as a “blighted D.C. property”. The stables and associated 9^th Street NW Victorian homes were razed or collapsed from neglect long ago. How do holes appear in city squares like #0367? Often, it’s a matter of greed.  Speculators “sit on a property” – like a stock – in the anticipation that it will eventually make them very rich. When economies tank and ready money suddenly dries up, property values plummet. The forces to continue to hold onto the languishing properties increase. The speculators then double down with renewed tenacity, figuring that they had lost a fortune (a theoretical loss since the full price valuation had never been achieved in the first place) and need to make up for their losses. That's where it gets interesting.

The pressures to do something more than putting up a “for sale sign” mount, so rather than sell or creatively construct, the owners opt to pave, privatize and promote. Now they have cash flow, a diminished tax burden (commercial versus blighted property tax) and can continue to hold what they think will be a winning hand. 

In her 1970 album (Ladies of the Canyon) Joni Mitchell (http://jonimitchell.com/) railed against the progressive loss of civility in cities through ruthless “urban planning.” Indeed, rather than saying “you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone” she could as easily said: - “you don’t know what you could have done till you can’t.”

“Soon after Harriet Tregoning became D.C. planning director in 2007, the developers of a proposed building for a prime downtown spot at Connecticut Avenue and K Street NW suggested opening a parking lot on their site until construction could begin. She cringed. “I grew up in St. Louis, and I know what a parking lot means, a surface parking lot,” Tregoning said. “If there’s an indicator species for distress, it’s a surface parking lot.” Jonathan O’Connell in the Washington Business Journal discussed the principles of “temporary urbanism” with Ms. Tregoning “as a means to bring dead construction zones and storefronts alive with active, temporary uses O'Connell points out that developers are often lukewarm to the idea of temporary uses as they are concerned that when the time for development does arrive the public will object to displacement of the temporary amenity. When the stopgap for every stalled development is a parking lot it stifles livability. The district has made strides in this regard under Tregoning's tenure but other cities show that much more is possible. But with the recession stalling plans for new construction around the city, she also knew the request was likely to be the first of many. So Tregoning began pushing a new concept — “temporary urbanism” — to bring dead construction zones and storefronts alive with active, temporary uses.”

(References: - http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2009/11/16/story6.html "WBJ discusses Temporary Urbanism with Harriet Tregoning" and from The Triangle, not just parking lots anymore... by fourthandeye@gmail.com)

You often hear long time Shaw residents say: - “Surely a paved-over empty lot is better than nothing.” or “You should have seen this place 20 years ago.” Well, think again! Profitable paved parking projects have an evil way of promoting their own permanence. These lots leave nasty dead zones in the city. Parking lots are nationally recognized by urban planners as properties that create opportunities for crime to flourish. They neither improve nor inspire a residential neighborhood. They only contribute to the feelings of neglect, danger and decay. "Obviously, nobody cares around here, so anything goes."

(Naylor Ct. parking lot circa 1989 - photo courtesy of Roger Theil )

  

By comparing these two maps (Baist’s 1924 and 1989) you will see “holes” in the block density appearing like the lost teeth of urban decay. The paved-over vacant lots represent lost opportunities to increase housing density in downtown D.C. by constructing something creative and exciting for people. Washington is rapidly growing up in terms of thinking about urban planning. It’s actually quietly becoming quite a hip and vibrant town for young people. The time to think of alleys as useful for only trash and services (like parking lots) is finished in the enlightened circles of national discussion about alleys.

A surplus of parking really can be too much of a good thing for any city. Each lot creates a new ‘dead zone’ in the middle of what ought to be a bustling commercial district or residential neighborhood. These dead zones block new growth and mean there is less room for the offices and homes that would supply a steady stream of office workers and residents who might patronize local businesses - and less room to cluster other businesses that would in turn attract more foot traffic.

Harriet Tregoning is right to push “temporary urbanism” as a way to temporarily use seemingly useless spaces. If you can't swim somewhere positive, at least tread water for a little while. Don't drown opportunities under a sea of asphalt so that they have a difficult time ever recovering. 

The neighborhood will aggressively block creating a parking lot on this vacant land at 1322 9^th Street NW. It’s one thing to create something from nothing but why on earth should the community accept creating nothing from something! It shouldn’t and won't.

The MOOD Out on the Street

Video Journalism Documents the “MOOD” After Closing

Warning … this video may cause dizziness if watched too closely. It is meant as documentation of the troublesome mayhem that occurs in the neighborhood as a direct result of the MOOD Lounge business. Turn up your speakers to get a fuller experience of the nocturnal neighborhood noises!

“The MOOD Lounge, after closing for the night late in the evening on Saturday, September 10th / early in the morning about 3:20 am on Sunday, September 11th. To show the noise the neighborhood puts up with. Filmed with a low-tech iPhone 3Gs.”

This property is belongs to the collection of buildings – stables, residences and artisan shops in the alley that were awarded the status of National Register Historic Property recognition in 1990. The MOOD Lounge behavior not only disrespectfully violates the restrictive covenants of this coveted national recognition, but they also continuously and lawlessly violate their own voluntary agreement with the community.

The owner of the property (1318 9^th Street LLC) has filed for bankruptcy. The MOOD Lounge business is under investigation by the AG’s office.

A petition to close the business is circulating through the community. The neighborhood, city council members, the ANC and many others are really tired of the bad mood being created by MOOD Lounge! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaqcSRD7kqg

MOOD turning the tables

3:00 a.m. vandalized tables around the corner from the 

MOOD Lounge (Azi's) after an evening of drinking and

 partying spills into the neighborhood. Police called 4 X.

(cell phone photo from a neighbor who could not sleep because of the noise!)

The MOOD might be changing at last

HOPEFULLY!

"By virtue of a certain Purchase Money Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents and Leases, and Security Agreement duly recorded December 29, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005185789(the "Deed of Trust") among the Land Records of the District of Columbia (the "Land Records"), and in accordance with Public Law 90-566 notice filed July 27, 2011 a default having occurred in the payment of the indebtedness secured thereby and the covenants contained therein, and at the request of the party secured thereby (the "Noteholder"), the undersigned Substitute Trustees, will sell, at public auction, within the office of ALEX COOPER AUCTIONEERS, INC., 5301 WISCONSIN AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 750, WASHINGTON, D.C. on Tuesday, August 30, 2011 at 11:00 am the following described land and premises Lot numbered Fifty-eight (58) in the subdivision made by the heirs of John Davidson of Square numbered Three Hundred Sixty-seven (367), as per plat recorded in the Office of the Surveyor for t he District of Columbia in Liber N.K. at folio 103."

(source  http://realestate.alexcooper.com/featured/details/1732/ ) 

[Editor's note: - while the sale of 1318 9th Street did not go through because the owner's filed for bankruptcy, this situation further increases the already intense public light and scrutiny on this highly questionable business]

It has been very difficult to protect the little stables in Naylor Court even though they are collectively on the National Register of Historic Properties. In fact when this stable (1316 Naylor Court) was deemed to have been "unstable" it was in fact so stable that the developer began to also rip down the party wall of the building next door into what is now the MOOD Lounge. The author's friend Orlando lived and worked comfortably in this little stable for many years refinishing furniture. It was stable.

Mind numbing sounds continue to blare through this party wall!

(check out the exposed wall speakers!)

Enjoy the video above to capture the community sentiment of 3 years ago

What can you do to help? You can sign the petition!

Please seriously consider signing the petition to close the MOOD Lounge. Naylor Court stables need to be protected from this sanctioned destruction and disrespect. They are all listed as National Historic Properties and protected by restrictive covenants. The direct link to the petition is http://www.change.org/petitions/dc-alcoholic-beverage-control-board-revoke-mood-lounges-alcohol-beverage-license 

The case hearing against the MOOD Lounge comes before ABRA through the attorney general's office on Sept 21st 2011. 

Let's hope that the MOOD changes and disappears. The neighborhood has had enough headaches already!