Wednesday, December 19, 2012

“Death Threat” received for Small Alley Building Dying from Abuse and Neglect (Part 1)


In many ways, buildings are like people. They age. They show signs of wear and tear. Some have hard lives and some have lives of grace and ease. Some are cared for and others are abused. Many show their scars. Others have makeovers. Some become fragile and decline while others live for centuries.  Unlike people, however, buildings are defenseless and cannot protect themselves from abuse and neglect (blight). Nature takes over and ultimately wins. Mortar escapes and is replaced by seeds of grass, weeds or even the seeds of trees carried by the wind, small animals or other vectors. The backbones of buildings (roofs) weaken and collapse. Many think of buildings as dumb, dead and disposable. Others think of buildings as reflective of the many lives they have lived. A collection of small buildings such as in Naylor Court is valued because of the aggregate and the sense of place that is conveyed. Dismantling the collection, one chipped component at a time diminishes the meaning of the place and eventually destroys it altogether. An excellent example of this obliteration endpoint - where there is nothing left to salvage - is Shepherd’s Alley.

Raze application by property owner, Mr. Bernard Ehrlich (301) 943-6804


When people who are unable to defend themselves from threats of injury seek protection, the courts can intervene through either protective custody or restraining orders against the threatening party. A requisite condition for this to happen is the ability to conclusively prove the intent to harm. In the case of the little brown National Register building in the Naylor Court alley (1322 9th Street rear), the owner has declared his intention to obliterate the building. This is the ultimate threat.

Fortunately for the alley, all of the buildings in it and in its sister block Blagden Alley, have been recognized for their uniqueness by being listed in the National Register of Historic Places since 1990. This designation is much more prestigious than simply existing in a "historic district." This is a critically reviewed nomination for recognition of the contribution of the location to the history of the city.

(Fig. 1) Recently the yellow stable was rescued and adaptively reused in elegant ways to become part of Darryl Carter’s new retail enterprise - below.
(Fig. 2) The alley building currently threatened with destruction is to the left of the restored stable.
According to Mr. Steve Callcott (Deputy Preservation Officer) in the Historic Preservation Office
“The owner of 1322 9th Street has filed a raze application with the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs.  We have alerted DCRA that the property is in an historic district and the application must be referred to our office for review, and they have ensured us that there is a “hold” on the application and that no permit will be issued without historic review.  Brendan Meyer in our office, who will be our project reviewer on this, will be contacting the owner to advise him of our review process and that the application will need to be forwarded to the Historic Preservation Review Board for its review.  Once we receive the application, we will post it on our public notice and schedule it for hearing before the HPRB to allow for community comment. (January 24, 2013)”


According to Mr. Brendan Meyer (Historic Preservation Specialist and project reviewer - HPA case #13-091) in the Historic Preservation Office:
“The building currently is qualified as a contributing building in the historic district. If that status remains unchanged by the Board, the raze application would then need to be heard by the Mayor’s Agent at a public meeting.
This is a lengthy and thorough process that has just begun. Under the regulations, a raze permit for a contributing building, although very rare, is a possible outcome. The HPRB and Mayors Agent hearings are open to the public so I encourage you to follow this case as it moves to the Board and to participate in the proceedings.”

(Fig. 3) North facing wall shows the elements of two sections of the building one of which has become the host to a rather large “tree” growing out of the side.



The small tree growing out of the side of the north-facing wall (Fig. 3) is not a bonsai. It’s an opportunistic growth that has reached considerable girth and bears witness to the length of time that this particular segment of the wall has been crumbling. Tree rings are easy to count! The roof has collapsed. The property is relatively unsecured and the building has become home to large rats that feed on the alley garbage from the nearby restaurants. It has also been suspected of being a place of criminal activity.

(Fig. 4)

1. New replacement condo construction
2. Original building restored– now Sundevich
3. Reproduction stable and condo – now The Nine (1863 stable destroyed in 2009)
4. Replacement construction – formerly the Salvation Army now MOOD Lounge
5. Original stable restored – now Darryl Carter Inc.
6. Original building – neglected and threatened with destruction
7. Long ago destroyed structures (2 buildings)
8. Long ago destroyed structures (5 buildings)
9. Original home restored

Over the years the small buildings in Naylor Court and Blagden Alley have been either willfully destroyed or allowed to deteriorate to the point that they destroy themselves by neglect. In figure 4 one can get an instant appreciation of the problem. Frequently, each property owner views only their own property without consideration of the collection of buildings and the impact of their actions on the rest of the alley.

Recently a former commercial garage in Blagden Alley (figures 5 and 6) was spared obliteration that had been proposed by developers. In that case, Mr. Brendan Meyer wrote the following in his HPRB Staff Report and Recommendation (HPA #12-503 - November 1, 2012)

“The street-fronting portion of the subject site is vacant, while the rear of the rear of the lot is occupied by a large one-story garage. Permit and map research indicate that the garage’s eastern-most portion was built as two-story alley dwellings in the 1880s which were combined, added on to in the rear, and altered by the removal of their second floors in 1922 for conversion to an automobile garage. The building was expanded to the west again in 1924, and again to the south in the mid-20th century with a concrete block addition. The building’s early residential use, conversion to automobile use in the 1920s, and vernacular brick construction are consistent with themes established in the Blagden Alley Historic District nomination; due to its date of construction/alteration prior to 1941 and basic integrity of form and materials, all but the concrete block portion of the building should be considered contributing to the historic district.”

(Fig. 5)

(Fig. 6) Blagden Alley Garage Threatened with Demolition, protected by HPO decision.



The approach to the little building on 1322 9th Street should follow the national guidelines outlined below.

“Stabilize Deteriorated Historic Materials and Features as a Preliminary Measure

“Deteriorated portions of a historic building may need to be protected through preliminary stabilization measures until additional work can be undertaken. Stabilizing may include structural reinforcement, weatherization, or correcting unsafe conditions. Temporary stabilization should always be carried out in such a manner that it detracts as little as possible from the historic building’s appearance. Although it may not be necessary in every preservation project, stabilization is nonetheless an integral part of the treatment Preservation; it is equally applicable, if circumstances warrant, for the other treatments.”
(From - The Secretary of the Interior’s Standard for the Treatment of Historic Properties – with Guidelines for preserving Rehabilitating Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, by Weeks and Grimmer, page 19).

This building needs to be stabilized immediately.  It should then be allowed to live and ultimately be restored and adaptively reused so that the dwindling collection of small alley buildings in this historic alley block is kept intact from this day forward. When one compares the block maps from the middle of the last century to maps of today, this block  (0367) now looks like Swiss cheese with empty lots where buildings have collapsed and been allowed to die through abuse and neglect over recent decades.  The buildings have progressively been replaced by parking lots – some legal and some questionable.

It is also highly likely that this property has been heavily contaminated by years of drained and dripped oil from hundreds of cars being stored or worked upon. This is another serious agency (EPA) issue for this property.

Automobile repair shops were a very high profile part of the 20th century history of many D.C. alleys, when the need for stables declined. The stables were adaptively converted and served the community superbly for decades. These were not high end businesses, but they filled a low end need. To preserve the history of an area or a collection of buildings, agencies and individuals responsible for preservation need to preserve the essence of the area, not just the charming or esthetically appealing buildings.

I really liked Mr. Meyer’s recognition of this fact in HPA #12-503 (November 1, 2012).

So, let’s be consistent with the precedent that has recently been set by HPO and use the same lens and metrics for HPA case #13-091 (outcome pending).

(Fig. 7 photo courtesy of OdC Studio)



   Contact information for the involved parties


Property Owner - Mr. Bernard Ehrlich (301) 943-6804

Project reviewer - Brendan Meyer, DC Office of Planning, Historic Preservation Office 1100 4th Street SW, #E650 Washington, DC 20024 phone: 202-741-5248 fax: 202-442-7638 brendan.meyer@dc.gov
Deputy Preservation Officer Historic Preservation Office - Steve Callcott, DC Office of Planning 1100 4th Street, SW, Suite 650-E Washington, DC  20024  (202) 741-5247 steve.callcott@dc.gov  

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Legal Protection for Stables & Small Alley Dwellings



September 11th 2012

Pressure to increase housing density in the city is increasing as D.C.'s population expansion continues. The utilitarian value of alleys is becoming increasingly recognized in this city and others, putting many small historic buildings like former stables and blacksmith shops and bicycle repair shops in danger of being razed without a second thought. This has already happened in Naylor Court and Blagden Alley despite recognition of the value of the collection of these historic buildings through the National Register of Historic Places. The Office of Planning is doing a survey of all of the major alleys in Washington and uncovering many hidden gems. Today National Trust lawyer Rob Nieweg (bio below) answered questions online through the Washington Post through the editorial guidance of Kathy Orton. The invitation for participation at the Washington Post is shown below.

Posted at 05:30 AM ET, 09/08/2012

Submit a question for the online chat on historic preservation and The Post’s Historic Home Contest

The Washington metro region has an abundance of historic homes — including everything from Georgian to Arts and Crafts, from Mid-century Modern to Farmhouse Vernacular, and from Federal style to International style — many of which have been lovingly restored to showcase their character-defining features.
Read more about the solid stock of historic gems in this area and view a photo gallery of the many architectural styles.
Rob Nieweg, the Washington field officer for the National Trust for Historic Preservation, will answer your questions about historic preservation on Tuesday, Sept. 11 at 1 p.m. The Washington Post Real Estate editors will also join the chat to discuss the Historic Home Contest.

***

HUMANIZING THE USE OF D.C. ALLEYS 
AND PROTECTING HISTORIC 
SMALL BUILDINGS SUCH AS STABLES.

Q.
(1) What "real protection" does being named to the National Register of Historic Places confer on a collection of properties such as the stables in Naylor Court and Blagden Alley (accepted in 1990)? How do residents harness this protection?

(2) With a height restriction in a city that is only twelve miles wide, increasing living density in the city is refocussing discussions on the increased use of the many named alleys in Washington and their small buildings. How does the concept of a "mews" as a mix of commercial, residential and pedestrian activities enter the conversation of urban planning and historic preservation?
            – September 10, 2012 7:03 PMPermalink

A.
ROB NIEWEG :
Thanks for your question.  In a nutshell, the National Register of Historic Places is a well-documented list of the historic resources which are worthy of preservation.  It's largely honorific.  On the other hand, under federal law, historic properties listed on the National Register (or eligible for listing) receive a measure of protection through what's called "Section 106 review."  It's a technical process, but one that's worth understanding if an historic place you value may be impacted by a federal undertaking.   Are the properties you mention threatened? 

RESPONSE TO Q #1 
In response to the first question, the buildings are not threatened by federal undertakings. They are simply at risk of demolition by developers who mistake or misrepresent carriage houses and stables for garages and tear them down. The value in the properties mentioned is in the collection rather than the strength of the individual small buildings. They are getting "picked of" one at a time.
            – September 11, 2012 1:11 PMPermalink

A.
ROB NIEWEG :
Understood.  In this sort of situation, National Register listing would help raise awareness of the value of the buildings.  Raise awareness and galvanize support for preservation. 
However, designation pursuant to a local law, like DC's preservation ordinance, would provide legal protection for the historic buildings.  Many such local ordinances have "teeth" and would require that the property owner must secure advance approval from an expert commission before demolishing a historic building. 
Q.
Q#1 PART 2 
(a) Thank you for expanding on the issue of legal protection of threatened historic properties. It's also good that the DC Historic Preservation Office has a lawyer dedicated to issues such as this. (b) Can you please share your thoughts about the second part of my original question that relates to the concept of "mews"?
            – September 11, 2012 1:26 PMPermalink

A.
ROB NIEWEG :
As for the place of the historic mews in a changing city, I'd offer two thoughts.  First, these special places contribute to the unique historic character of DC.  Wouldn't be the same place without them.  Second, even with the push for more density, the District's mews provide special opportunities for small-scale housing units.  Either way, the local community shouldn't lose its character without a good deal of careful planning (or, if necessary, a fight). 
–      September 11, 2012 1:54 PM
I'd recommend that you and your allies should contact the National Trust's Forum Reference Desk via FORUM@nthp.org to share more background information regarding your preservation campaign.  Perhaps we can lend a hand. 
Thanks everyone for your good questions. And, thanks to The Washington Post for continuing coverage of preservation issues. Historic preservation has come a long way in recent years, and now has important roles to play in the social, educational, and economic lives of our community. I urge you to support your local, state, and national historic preservation organizations.
***

Rob Nieweg

Rob Nieweg is the Field Director & Attorney for the National Trust for Historic Preservation's Washington Field Office, which works to save historic resources in Virginia, Maryland, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. He has worked as a preservation advocate since 1989, when he directed Landmark West, a citizens group working to preserve Manhattan's Upper West Side. Since joining the staff of the National Trust in 1995, Rob has worked to preserve historic places and strengthen the grass-roots preservation movement in Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Utah, West Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia - his home state. Rob Nieweg holds a BA in history from Vassar College and an MS in historic preservation from Columbia University. He is a graduate of the University at Buffalo Law School and a member of the New York State Bar.